Meds & Compliance

bob-speers-picsPower of Meds Compliance: Active ingredient or placebo

By Robert Speers

Occasionally, the outcome of a clinical drug study can be important even if the results indicate a “failed” trial. One such study, conducted in the 1970s, was the Coronary Drug Project. The study tested a lipid-lowering drug in a large, multicenter comparison involving 53 cooperating clinics. The study was funded by the National Heart and Lung Institute, not by a drug company. This fascinating study tells us a great deal about the practice of medicine today.

 

In this study of approximately 4,000 men with coronary heart disease, the drug clofibrate was compared to placebo in a randomized, double-blind trial over a 5-year period. The 5-year mortality in the men treated with clofibrate was 20% compared to 20.9% in the patients given placebo. This differential was clearly insignificant, and the study concluded with a negative outcome for the medication.

 

Surprising discovery

 

The study produced a surprising additional finding for which the authors could not account. About one-fifth of the men in the study failed to take their medications regularly, and this group with poor adherence amounted to the same percentage for both groups, those who received clofibrate and those who received placebos. In those who complied with their prescriptions there was a significantly lower mortality rate, regardless of whether they were taking the real medication or the placebo pills.

 

Among those assigned to the clofibrate group, the poor adherers had significantly higher mortality rates (25%) than those of good adherers (15%). The results in the placebo group were amazingly similar. Those who complied with their prescriptions of dummy pills had a mortality rate of 15%, while the group of men who failed to regularly take the placebos had a mortality rate of 28%.

 

How can one explain the finding that patients taking “fake” medication, believing it to be a powerful new medication, would have a significantly lower mortality rate than the group of men who did not take the fake medication regularly?

 

The authors of the study could not come up with any explanation of the results and reported their confusion in the final discussion of the study. During the late 1970s, medical researchers generally considered the placebo effect to be medical legend, so they failed to consider this aspect in their conclusions.

 

Today we know, from recent studies and fMRI imaging, that placebos do affect the body and the brain physiologically.

 

The New England Journal of Medicine recognized the significance of this study in 1980 with an article entitled “Influence of adherence to treatment and response of cholesterol on mortality in the Coronary Drug Project.” [NEJM, 1980,303:1038-1041.]

 

I believe that the skepticism of modern medicine toward the placebo effect has kept this study hidden in the shadows of medical research instead of giving it the attention it deserves.

 

Power of placebo

 

First, the study provides definitive, measurable evidence of the power of placebo to improve health.

Second, the study provides evidence of the importance of drug adherence and compliance, albeit in a tricky manner.

Dr. Fabrizio Benedetti, a leading expert on the placebo effect, supported this conclusion when he wrote, “This [Coronary Drug Project] suggests that placebo may be quite powerful, and its effects may be intertwined with other phenomena, such as compliance and adherence.” [Benedetti F. Placebo Effects: Understanding the Mechanisms in Health and Disease. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009:228-229.]

Most recently, it has been suggested that the placebo effect is the psychological component associated with all forms of treatment. Complying with the verbal instructions of a doctor or pharmacist is part of this psychological component. All healthcare professionals participate in the psychosocial context of treatment and have a direct impact on the effectiveness of a drug treatment.

The role of the pharmacist in maintaining the patient’s positive expectations associated with taking a medication is of critical importance. Conversely, the pharmacist can recognize the dangers of a patient’s noncompliance and work to reduce nonadherence in the process of prescription fulfillment.

Pharmacists can most effectively participate in the ritual of medicine through positive communication, providing clear and accurate directions, and listening to the patient for the maximum benefit associated with treatment.

 

Robert Speers, MA, is writing a book, The Powerful Placebo: The Effect of Expectations on Health.